Why should teachers care about digital literacy?
Teachers should care about digital literacy because, as
suggested throughout Palfrey and Gasser’s introduction in ‘Born Digital’, our
digital lives and our use of technology can be positive or destructive for our
development and self esteem.
One of the main themes in ‘Born Digital’ is the use of
technology to form groups or subcultures within society; we tend to socialise
online with others ‘connected to us by mutual interests and shared interaction’
(Palfrey and Gasser, 2008; p.5). Teachers need to acknowledge digital literacy
and be aware that a large part of the digital natives’ life is broadcast across
digital platforms, which can be an asset to children’s growing social
confidence and inclusion in their interests. Social media can be used positively
to allow children an identity that can be shared across a physical distance,
and a representation of them that others can engage with.
The main implication for teachers regarding children’s digital
lives is being aware of the ways in which children are harnessing digital
platforms for communication. The main concerns held by adults are cyberbullying,
online predators, and accessing explicit material (Palfrey and Gasser, 2008). These
are problems that need to be addressed through education, particularly as longitudinal
studies show a year on year increase in children being bullied using new
technology (Noret and Rivers, 2006). Being digitally literate is a privilege
children have in the modern world, but the role of educators needs to be making
children aware of the responsibility involved in engaging
with the digital world. As pointed out by Palfrey and Gasser, problems with
children’s engagement with technology can only arise where children’s useage of
digital media is unregulated by adults, when children are left to explore
technology without guidance and misunderstand what is appropriate to being
viewing or doing online.
Parents and teachers aren’t involved in the decisions that
young people are making as they are ‘cut off from digital native children
because language and cultural barriers are too great’ (Palfrey and Gasser,
2008; p.10). This is a highly controversial view, which can be challenged by
the fact that many children engage digitally because they look up to adult role
models who are using technology for different means. Teachers should care about digital literacy
because we need to encourage children to be able to criticise and reflect on
digital technology. A large part of teaching should revolve around increasing
children’s understanding that the internet represents user generated content
and can be self-censored.
We need to ensure children are wise to the fact that what we
engage with through digital media shouldn’t be taken at face value; someone’s
online profile is a construct of them which reveals certain aspects about
themselves which they choose to share. Increasing children’s awareness of
digital media as a tool for representation will address issues such as privacy
and being aware of the existence of online predators. Similarly, a study of 92
children found that when exposed with cyberbullying, children recommended blocking
/ avoiding messages and telling someone as the best coping strategies (Smith et
al, 2008). Palfrey and Gasser suggest that education which draws on children’s
natural common sense, and encourages them to be transparent in their digital
use, will lead to safe and beneficial digital engagement. The key is adult
engagement; if we as teachers address issues that arise, we can help children
to be informed, safe, digitally literate citizens.
(559 words)
Bibliography
Noret, N., & Rivers, I. (2006). The prevalence of
bullying by text message or email: Results of a four year study. British Psychological
Society: Cardiff
Palfrey, J. and Gasser, U. (2008) Born Digital:
Understanding the first generation of digital natives. New York: Basic Books,
p. 1-15
Smith, P., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M. Fisher, S., Russell, S.
And Tippett, N. (2008) Cyberbullying: it’s nature and impact on secondary
school pupils, Journal of Child Psychology and Child Psychiatry, 49:4, pp. 376-385
I agree with what you have said in regards to Palfrey and Gasser (2008) suggesting that 'education which draws on children’s natural common sense, and encourages them to be transparent in their digital use, will lead to safe and beneficial digital engagement.' I feel that providing children with the opportunity to explore their ideas and questions has the possibility of leading children to become more curious individuals.
ReplyDeleteI found issue of cyber bullying which has been raised through Palfrey and Gasser (2008) to be very interesting. My reading 'Toxic Child Hood' by Sue Palmer (2006) stressed how technology has become faster than ever and allows us to access and do more than we ever have done before. Do you think this power has an effect on how cyber bullying is increasing each year?
ReplyDeleteI do agree that we need to educate children on how to use the internet safely. Personally, I feel that if you teach children what is acceptable when using the internet then they are more likely to feel comfortable talking to you if something has happened or been said which the child is unsure of.